TalkingPoints
TalkingPoints Join over 80,000 readers

Your News, Your Views.

← Celtic vs Hibernian

Do you agree with Mark Clattenburg on Hibs' goal against Celtic?

ericarfa19676mo ago

Yes,again celtic and there supporters winging yet as always the officials save them.Time and time again

martin.crawford6mo ago

The officials saved Celtic on Sunday!?

weespeckybhoy19706mo ago

Absolute nonsense was clear as day it hit his hand and the rule is clear as day when it suits them , how many dodgy handball decisions have involved Celtic , it's blatant cheating plain and simple

skevd636mo ago

Insufficient evidence of the VAR man being a dirty wee mason, it did go to VAR , that's for the clown that asked why it didn't go to sar, the STONEWALL pen didn't go to VAR because of temporary blindness by officials

fenian.pinguin6mo ago

Despite incompetent officials on and off the park Celtic got the business done. Let the fight go on.hj

jimmccoll206mo ago

WHY DID IT GO TO SAR THEN RUBBISH

johnprior9996mo ago

Before we sanction VAR to the bin….Yesterday VAR enabled two corrections…. Firstly the sending off and secondly the first goal. Without VAR neither would have gone in our favour 🍀

mrcrobo606mo ago

Even Joe Newell didn't think it was a goal just look at his reaction when it was given straight out of the Theirry Henry school of basket ball . a disgrace .

weefatboy19696mo ago

I wondered when someone would attempt to put these two incidents in bed together, night and day decisions, one skimmed his finger nails and is definitely inconclusive the other however comes off his forearm and then his hand, two out of four camera angles clearly show this to be undoubtedly conclusive. The Scottish official saw what he WANTED to see (;-0)

skevd636mo ago

The masonic officials

michaelclark040720026mo ago

This incorrect decision could have played a part on the outcome of the title. What is the point of VAR, it takes for ever to decide and they still get it wrong

martin.crawford6mo ago

Yep. It is quite literally re-refereeing games whilst claiming not to. So infuriating

billymc6126mo ago

Deliberately

johnbrannan46mo ago

Totally agree Var has destroyed the game they keep searching for a reason to justify their opinion

tmcq506mo ago

I agree to an extent John but if we didn't have it Douglas Ross' ridiculous offside when he's 2 yards behind the play would've ruled a perfectly good goal out. Without VAR these refs and ar's could cheat with even more impunity than they already do.

paddy6mo ago

Looking for reasons to suck the fun out of football

billymc6126mo ago

He is 100% correct as it says in the law, that said, went to var ref confirmed, so it is a deliberate act to deny celtic the points, celtic should sue each individual involved, also the spl for allowing this blatant cheating to continue, if not we will no doubt be denied the title by these officials...

skevd636mo ago

Get these cheats out of ANY FOOTBALL they have no place in the game at all, biased is mildly describing their BLATANT CHEATING

jmccolgan5256mo ago

No goal even Collum agrees at least

johnprior9996mo ago

It will be interesting to see if we get the “Opps honest mistake “ or “ it came off his chest and onto his arm “ or “ we didnae have a camera as good as the Sky wan”…… burst yer heid…..🍀

tmcq506mo ago

I thought that the goal should've been disallowed as well I was convinced Willie Collum was at pains to iterate that on his Sky show, any goal scored from hitting the hand must be disallowed. We should've had a stonewall penalty when Yang was pushed in box and Ross just guessed offside for our first goal as couldn't keep up with play, he was 2 yards behind.