TalkingPoints
TalkingPoints Join over 80,000 readers

Your News, Your Views.

← Radek Vitek

What should Man Utd do with Radek Vitek in 2026/27?

febced11mo ago

Now he's sold and Man U will bank £14m - way below £20m.

stevesharkey492mo ago

The mistake was made last season. He should have been first choice at OT. I still think he is the best keeper on our books.

larrylaffan602mo ago

Keep him

michealtumuramye2mo ago

Keep

derekf2mo ago

I would have Vitek set up as the number 1 for the domestic cup ties and alternative CL first-phase matches ‘à la Romero’ to build up his CV for this season. We need to be fully shot of Onana and the Turkish dude - those two are still on the books and an embarrassment.

geldroper2mo ago

Loan him out with no option to buy and see if Lammers has a relaps. If not sell next season with some options like buy back or %

barryroberts722mo ago

It's a waste of time keeping him to compete with Lammens mainly because that will make him a number 2 and he's said he doesn't want to be a number 2, plus we already have a new number 2 now in Darlow, so really it's either we loan him out again or we sell him.

stephenjholmes12mo ago

Our number 2 should be more high profile than Darlow.

dklutchman3mo ago

Keep him and play him in Cup matches..

stephenogbo4654mo ago

In my opinion I would suggest we keep him to complete with laments next season since there's a lot of competition to make him grow and get better experience

morganjoebryan5mo ago

Sell him to Bristol city, easy decision

freddie4mo ago

Don't think they have the money to spend big enough on him

dale.odonnell5mo ago

I wouldn't sell unless there's a bid worth £25m. Otherwise, loan him out, preferably to a top-flight club in one of the best leagues. Highly doubt Vitek wants to be a backup after playing so well at a high standard this season. Plenty of recognition for it in terms of individual awards, too.

jjflash4221mo ago

Why do our board not get value for money for our players.Vitek is so talented and we price him at £14m,and we need add ons to get that+a sell on.Hes better than Rushworth who's gone for upto £30m,and Trafford upto £45.And I thought Wilcox was getting better.And amass,£6m est,what's going on with our board.

thetruthpersonified2mo ago

If sold, with first refusal and a sell on clause.

ianratcliffe19695mo ago

Keep him as no2

dale.odonnell5mo ago

Tough ask and may hinder his development. Could sign a goalkeeper for around £5m and promote another academy goalkeeper to replace Tom Heaton.

febced15mo ago

We need quality back up GKs. He deserves a chance after his Bristol City heroics.

dale.odonnell5mo ago

True, but I don't see anyone taking Lammens' spot next season. It would be brave from whoever is the head coach to take both goalkeepers on next season. Vitek will feel he has a point to prove and probably wouldn't give it longer than a year if it stunted his development.

dklutchman5mo ago

Keep him as backup for Lammens

dale.odonnell5mo ago

Do you think Vitek will be happy being backup after spending the season as the first choice in the Championship and getting plenty of recognition for it?

fredliexmulindwa5mo ago

Keep him as Lammens' competitor

knightinwhitesatin2mo ago

We could use him like we. did Sergio Romero in Cup games to give Lammens a break as we did with De. Gea the goalkeeping has always been a merry-go-round always buying and selling backup keepers

seanfisher5mo ago

Ideally, having Vitek as a back up to Lammens is the best outcome… but it depends if he’s willing to take that role