According to David Ornstein, Forest are adamant they want £120m guaranteed for Elliot Anderson. This comes after City verbally offer £106m with add ons to take it to £120m. Are Forest right to demand such a sum or is it risky to tempt City into walking away?

They’ll pay alright.He’s not a player Man City would want to see in the opposition side and when he’s gone to one of our competitions then we will pray for him to break a leg .he won’t be on a losing team for a long time

gorriejonathan3mo ago

I think they’re in the right. He’s worth whatever they think he is. How is he seen among Forest fans? Loved at Newcastle but wasn’t the player he is now

leeclarke05083mo ago

Spot on mate and that's what people miss. Often clubs turn around and say 'we want £130m' which translates to, he's not for sale. Fair play to Forest that they've stood firm I say.

dale.odonnell3mo ago

City won’t walk away. Regardless of 115 charges, they’re bold enough and sit on a bottomless pile of cash.

markmarston3mo ago

Absolutely right to demand that… under contract so pay up or move on. For the record, City won’t be shortchanged if they bid £150m! You’ll get 12 years out of him and he’ll be contribute towards several trophies no doubt

glstark163mo ago

Totally agree why should we be a give away club

dantowen819513mo ago

Forest are absolutely entitled to demand as much as they want, so fair play to them What happens if Anderson chucks in a transfer request though? I feel this could get messy with Marinakis