Who would you rather Chelsea sign, John Stones or Maxence Lacroix?

philchristie19552mo ago

Would have to say Lacroix simply because of the fitness history. Stones is a decent player but reminds me of Fofna in as much as bothhave never returned to peak levels since their respective injuries

shamanth.jayaram2mo ago

Lacroix obviously, but Stones at 32 is still way better than Badiashille and Tosin

patrickwalton842mo ago

I going for maxence lacroix I prefer to sign to Chelsea player next season definitely

bluezola1092mo ago

I sign both we always get injury players in defence, should get a new goalie too the ones we got leave too many goals in especially that Sanchez

freddie2mo ago

Lacroix would be brilliant and genuinely thing he is like Real Madrid level potential. Stones would be great for experience but worry about his injuries

awofe19662mo ago

I will prefer if chelsea get two of them on board. We need experience 5&6 at the back.This was lack last season which pave way both big and small team to capitalised on our defective. So 2 of them are good to go for signing

femiwealth232mo ago

If maxence will do it let him come if you will prefer stones buy him, but remember there must be change in form, we want the best.

prjbranch262mo ago

John Stones and get rid of badashille , disasi , tosin and Fofana ASAP .

dantowen819512mo ago

Both! Get a proven prem quality defender in Lacroix for a big fee and then Stones on a free, and suddenly Chelsea’s defence is already a lot better

philchristie19552mo ago

Trouble with Stones is his injury record. Yes, he's good on the valley and experienced but taking another player likely to spend more time on the treatment table rather than the pitch is a risk

trapperj5002mo ago

John stones is an experienced full back and would fit very well

patcahill4532mo ago

John Stones

kennyrath2mo ago

John Stones brings presence and experience, which we’ve missed after recent departures. Don’t know Lacroix

rsaager172mo ago

Neither....Stones caught ball watching in space rather than marking for that last Argentine header...no foot speed. LaCroix was schooled by Bellingham on last goal in 3rd place game...not impressed by his W/C display.

mmaphalu2mo ago

Both John Stones and Maxence Lacroix

jamesshearman232mo ago

I’m all for this! It should be Lacroix and Stones. I know he’s 32 and injury prone but we desperately need experience and leadership

smifferz812mo ago

Why not both??? John can give his experience and wisdom like Thiago did and Max can play the majority of the time

leeclarke05082mo ago

Really not convinced Lacroix is good enough for Chelsea, save the £60m and sign Stones on a free. No brainer for me.

kosowo20012mo ago

Maxence Lacroix possesses impressive speed and has already played in a 3-back system, which is why he fits Xavi's style. Stones, on the other hand, is the exact opposite—slow, standing back there like a statue.

kosowo20012mo ago

John Stones a star? He's washed up. He doesn't fit Alonso's style—he lacks speed, and Xavi wants quick defenders because he plays a high line and they need to cover a lot of ground to back up the very attacking full-backs or wing-backs.